Baseball is a dying sport. Even if
it’s not.
NASCAR is a fading sport. Maybe it’s the one dying.
On Saturday night, Game 1 of the ALCS went head-to-head with
a key race in NASCAR’s ill-fated version of playoffs. There was no college
football on broadcast, though Johnny Football and Texas A&M attracted a
good sized audience to ESPN. NBC and CBS ran re-runs.
It was MLB vs. NASCAR. And NASCAR lost. Badly.
By 40 % in the key demo of 18 to 49 year olds. By more than 1.2 million
viewers. The notion that baseball’s audience is old and shrinking may be
accurate to a point.
But it’s still way more popular than NASCAR. How did this
happen?
If it feels like NASCAR has taken a precipitous drop from
the nation’s collective sport consciousness, you’d be right. Things have become
so dire that ESPN and TNT were willing to forego the final year of their TV
contract with the sport to let Fox and NBC – both desperate for programming on
their fledging cable networks, Fox
Sports 1 and NBCSN
– televise it in 2014. NASCAR
balked at whatever the terms of the deal were.
The sport is looking over the abyss and it’s only going to
get worse next year, with 2 of the 3 broadcasters – Fox still airs the first
half of the season – anxious to walk away.
It wasn’t supposed to be like this. In its 10th year, NASCAR’s
<insert sponsor title> Chase for the Cup has provided the exact sort of
bump the PGA
has received from the FedEx Cup. That is to say – none.
The Chase for the Cup was a horrible overreaction to Matt
Kenseth cruising to the 2003 series championship. “There was no drama,” people
said. “Kenseth was a boring winner,” people cried. “Things need to change,” the
NASCAR offices heard.
And thus was born the Chase for the Cup. It was supposed to
ratchet up interest in the sport despite the annual autumn onslaught of college
football, pro football and the MLB playoffs. It was supposed to provide
incentive to win races. It was supposed to eliminate the cries of “boring” that
permeated through
the NASCAR community in 2003.
The Chase for the Cup isn’t the reason why NASCAR is a
fading sport. It is merely a symptom of the problem.
For a solid 10 years, NASCAR has slowly whittled away at the
pillars of what made the sport the cultural phenomenon it became in the early
2000s, after Fox and NBC first jumped on board and elevated the story from niche
cable programming to a weekly broadcast standard.
The tracks that served as the foundation for the sport?
Gone, replaced by cookie
cutter 1.5 mile tracks that all look, feel and race the same.
The personalities that drove the moonshinin’ vibe? Gone, reduced
to mere spats by an overreaching sanctioning body eager to squash any potential
beefs.
The “boys will be
boys” mantra and the “if you ain’t cheatin’, you ain’t tryin’” garage standards
completely erased.
The technology of the cars – including the tremendously terrible
Car of Tomorrow – has left NASCAR looking more and more like an IndyCar race.
And if you’ve
watched any IndyCar lately, though ratings would indicate that would only
be me, you’d see that IndyCar is looking a lot more like NASCAR and its
drivers, like Will Power, acting more like the NASCAR drivers of yesteryear.
In essence, NASCAR has lost its soul. Instead of trying to
find it, it’s trying to fool the public. There have been talks around
shortening races – as if an extra 100 miles of racing is the problem, not the
300 unexciting miles before that. There was even a suggestion on Twitter that
NASCAR officials are open to Monday night
racing, further divorcing itself from its roots.
Through all of this, it is rather shocking that NASCAR
officials refuse to address any of the issues that are at the core of the sport
and at the core of why the casual fan – like the guy typing this blog post –
has left the sport in droves.
At the top of the list is the quality of the racing. There
is no more bumping and rubbing. There are no more doorhandle to doorhandle
duels. The cars are too good, the drivers are too good and the crews are too
good, which is all too bad. Cars driving in circle is not what I was drawn to
NASCAR for.
The commercialization has always been there in the sport,
but it has been taken to such dizzying heights that the line between reality
and satire are blurred. I tried to watch the Pepsi 400 on TNT over the summer.
I couldn’t. It felt
like there was a commercial every 8 laps. I don’t care if the race is still
on in a little box in the corner – I don’t need to be inundated with ads.
As part of the commercialization is the drone of
commercialized drivers that are trained to spit out six sponsors before answering
a question about what it’s like to win the Daytona 500. Imagine if LeBron James
thanked Nike first after winning the NBA title?
Then there is the length of the NASCAR season, stretching
from February to November – even Bud Selig thinks that schedule is a bit
intense.
Most importantly, the Chase of the Cup has actually exceeded
what the FedEx Cup has done for the PGA Tour – and that’s not a good thing.
While the FedEx Cup exists, the notion of winning a golf tournament still far
outweighs accumulating points. Tiger Woods is not judged by “series titles,”
but how many tournaments he wins and how many majors. When the FedEx Cup
tournaments roll around, there is a heightened sense of excitement because all
the best players are playing in the same tournament.
NASCAR has that every week. So all the Chase for the Cup
does is switch the focus – from the first race on – from who wins to where
people finish. How many Daytona 500s has Jimmie Johnson won? How many Cup
titles? I can answer the latter, but not the former.
And that, my friends, is the heart of the matter. Man, did I bury the lead again?
The fact is, NASCAR is no longer about who wins the races.
When you watch Tiger Woods play golf, it doesn’t matter if
he finishes third or seventh or last – it matters if
he won or lost. That’s the drama. That’s the hook. That’s the excitement.
In NASCAR, it does matter – far too much – if Jimmie Johnson
finished 7th or 8th. That’s not exciting. That’s not why people watch sports.
Until NASCAR puts the proper focus on winning races, and not gobbling up points, it will continue its steep, steady decline from relevance.
Follow me on Twitter
Nice read, Sean.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I like NASCAR. Just wish it was more exciting.
Deleteit's the economy, it's screwed. and when the cars get so refined, they becomes like a toaster, can opener, or washing machine- they're "done". corporate America ruined NASCAR. watching a car run with Viagra or Trojan Condoms sponsorship, it just looks DUMB. it makes the drivers look dumb too.
DeleteNice Story Sean. NASCAR has done everything wrong from 2004 on, the chase and the cot being the main culprit. When Nascar introduced the chase they should have done away with bonus points for leading laps, and reward winners by giving more bonus points. I don't watch racing as much as I did before the chase.
ReplyDeleteBooing First Lady, Michelle Obama and Second Lady, Dr. Jill Biden at a race where they were promoting hiring veterans was my last straw.
ReplyDeleteYou could boo the politician, but not the family. That's below the belt. Also, NASCAR did not do one thing after the incident.
I actively tell people to avoid NASCAR and ask them, "do you want your money going to racism, bigotry, misogyny, and hate?" They always say, "no".
I think most of the op's points are farce, but the one I agree with and speaks volume, is the disappearance of fun unique tracks like N Wilkesboro, Rockingham and the older Atlanta. And the emergence of Kansas, Kentucky, Las Vegas, Chicago. If anyone is unfamiliar with these, they are the exact same shape and size. Michigan was one of the worst races to watch, so they duplicated it with Fontana. NASCAR introduced Texas and revised Atlanta to look exactly like what Charlotte already looked like. so were now at around 10 races (over 25% of the schedule) on the same 2 tracks. As an Earnhartd fan I admit I lost interest when he died, but now I watch the sport as part of a fantasy nascar pool and I must say I found the personalities in the sport just as interesting, if not more so, than they were in the 90's. I truly believe that a large (maybe not largest) factor in the demise of this sport is the courses themselves. And for some reason this is ignored.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, NASCAR (The North American "Stock Car" Association) ceased to exist a long time ago!! There has been nothing on the track resembling a stock car for decades. The saying used to be, "What Wins on Sunday Sells on Monday". Races today are comprised of wind-tunnel tested body configurations descaled to look like Chevy's or Dodges. It used to be about getting the most of factory configurations and power plants. And, others are right about too many commercials and a ticket price that has blocked out the very fans supporting the growth of the sport.
ReplyDeleteNascar needs to get red of all non spthern tracks excluding indy, and Michigan bring back hickory, north Wilkesboro, south bostan ,and a lot morw historic nascar tracks. Last but not least BRING BACK WINSTON BRING BACK WINSTON BRING BACK WINSTON
ReplyDeleteNascar needs to get red of all non spthern tracks excluding indy, and Michigan bring back hickory, north Wilkesboro, south bostan ,and a lot morw historic nascar tracks. Last but not least BRING BACK WINSTON BRING BACK WINSTON BRING BACK WINSTON
ReplyDeleteGolf is dying faster than NASCAR. Nobody is playing golf anymore except wealthy old white men and moms who were formerly soccer/tennis moms. NASCAR still has hope: a dedicated fan base that's loyalty goes from very young to very old, but they need to cut out the over commercialism, simply the winning formula, and make the cars look more like cars than cut-out toys. I don't know if the organization is up to making these necessary changes.
ReplyDeleteWay too many commercials. Seems like all the good stuff happens during a commercial which typically happens every five minutes
ReplyDelete