What the PGA Tour Taught PR Pros About Controlling the Narrative

When it comes to public relations in 2023, few things are more important than being first. Thanks to social media and aggregated news outlets, the first story out becomes the accepted story.

happy rory mcliroy
There’s something else important to remember. You can control the narrative. But you cannot lie, because that makes everything worse.

On the morning of June 6, I was in a client meeting when my cellphone started buzzing uncontrollably. I assumed it was an emergency, the only question was if it was professional or family. I checked my phone to realize it was neither. I’m a big golf fan, so everyone I knew was texting me about the sport’s breaking news on CNBC.

I left that meeting and watched the now-infamous CNBC interview myself. The PGA Tour and LIV Golf, funded by the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia, had agreed to a merger. It was a stunner beyond belief. The PGA Tour had aggressively pushed back against the Saudi influx of money, proudly standing upon its moral standing as defenders 9/11 victims and their families. There were lawsuits filed by both tours against the other.

As it turned out, the “merger” was beyond belief because it was not a merger. Shortly after the CNBC interview aired, the official press release crossed the wire. The word “merger” was not in the press release. The Saudi’s Public Investment Fund had, for lack of a better word, had bought the PGA Tour.

Or as the PGA Tour put it in the press release, the Public Investment Fund would offer a “world-class investing experience.” Insert the eye rolls from millions of golf fans.

As we examine the PR nightmare that resulted since the announcement, there is the undeniable fact that any agreement between the PGA Tour and LIV Golf would’ve carried negative press. The battle between the two leagues, both in the court of law and public opinion, has been fierce, nasty, and endless.

In one specific way, the PGA Tour’s pre-emptive media spin effectively controlled the narrative. Nearly every news story still refers to the agreement as a merger, like this headline from Fox News, “Tom Watson wants answers on PGA Tour-LIV Golf merger.”

liv golf sucks
Of course, the word “merger” only appears in the headline of that Fox News story because, again, it’s not a merger. Even the PGA Tour’s leader Jay Monahan referred to the agreement as a “framework” for a deal, hesitant to say the word merger.

While PGA Tour successfully inserted the word they wanted into the discussion, it has significantly weakened its credibility. The organization proudly went on CNBC to talk about a merger, only for it to be revealed it’s not actually a merger.

There are two vitally important lessons that every PR professional should take from this approach.

First, it’s never, ever been more important to get out first with your version of a story – especially if it’s negative. For better or worse, the PGA Tour and the Public Investment Fund were able to control the narrative from the outset and got every media member to use their chosen framing. That is a strong example of good crisis communications.

However, the PGA Tour failed on a critical part that is the second lesson that PR professionals need to remember. It’s never, ever been more important to tell the truth.

As reality set in – for golf fans, for players, for corporate sponsors, and even for Congress – the words from the PGA Tour on the morning of June 6 quickly rang hollow.

Even though they were first out with a story, their lack of transparency has caused irrevocable damage. They said it was a merger, but it wasn’t. What else aren’t they telling us?

The framework of the agreement was finally leaked to the media on June 27 – exactly three weeks later – and it proved that not much has been officially decided on.

No matter how bad the story you’re trying to spin is, you can’t let it cost you your credibility.

Once you’ve lost your credibility, it’s nearly impossible to get it back. 

Follow me on Twitter

Comments