“The NCAA has nothing to do with the bowl
season” is one of college football’s most annoying fallacies.
It’s time they start caring. For too long, the
NCAA has ceded the postseason system in its most watched sport to the Power
Five conferences. In the shocker of all shockers, these conferences have only
cared about their bottom line.
We’re left with a bowl season that is too
long, too commercial, and too boring. Does anyone benefit from a Sun Belt team
playing a MAC team in mid-December in front of 25,000 empty seats?
Well, it does
benefit ESPN. That’s about it.
We know the power brokers of college football
won’t change the bowl season because it works for them. The New Year’s Six and
the College Football Playoff bring in more than enough money to satisfy their
needs.
But the bowl system isn’t satisfying my needs
as a college football fan who has long
obsessed over bowl games. Therefore, I humbly suggest these six ways the
NCAA can step in and fix this mess:
1)
Bowls Start After Early Signing Period
The single stupidest part of bowl season is a
recent development, thanks to college football’s new early signing period. The
past two years, the early
signing day coincided with the always thrilling Frisco Bowl. This December,
it meant both San Diego State and Ohio coaches had to simultaneously sign
recruits and play a football game. How stupid, right?
It makes no sense for any team to be playing on such an important day. By moving the
bowls beyond the early signing period, not only are you giving every single FBS
team an equal shake, you are ending the ridiculous
early bowl games that ESPN has grown to love.
Seriously, there were a handful of bowl games
on Dec. 15 last year. This was only two weeks after the regular season ended.
There wasn’t even a bye week after Army/Navy! One of the reasons bowl games
were so successful is that fans had to wait weeks – excruciatingly long weeks –
until football came back.
If no bowl game is ever played again before
Dec. 22, I’ll be happy.
2) 5,000
Free Tickets (at least) for Each Team
We know the song and dance by now. Team A is
selected for a bowl game. Team A begs and pleads
with fans to buy their tickets, and not the super cheap tickets on StubHub,
to help line the pockets of bowl executives.
Just stop it. There is no reason why colleges should
be forced to buy tickets for family members or bands. Isn’t the point to create
a college football atmosphere in a neutral site?
By giving away (at least) 10,000 tickets, bowl
games will ensure at least people will be in the stands, while still having
plenty of tickets to sell and make money. The majority of these games are merely
TV shows at this point.
You wouldn’t send Stephen Colbert out there to
perform in front of empty seats.
3)
20,000 Minimum Attendance
It’s really annoying during bowl season to know
some kids are playing their final football game ever and their audience is
40,000 empty seats.
The NCAA requires schools to achieve a 15,000
minimum attendance average to continue playing FBS football. Why can’t they do
the same for bowl games? Get an average of at least 20,000 people in the
stadium over 3 years – I don’t care if they are paid to attend – and you can
keep your bowl game.
4)
Transfers & Redshirts Can Play
The bowl season, for every team outside of the
New Year’s Six, is an exhibition. Sure, some games mean more to some schools
than other, but generally, the games don’t really matter.
We’ve seen this new reality in action over the
past few years as surefire (and some not so surefire) NFL draft picks skip
the bowl game to prepare for the Scouting Combine. I have absolutely 0.0%
problem with this. They aren’t getting paid. Good for them.
But it does create a vacuum of stars. So why
not embrace the bowl season’s existence as the launching pad to the following
year by allowing transfers and redshirts to play without impacting eligibility?
The redshirt rule has already been relaxed to
allow for 4 games to be played before the redshirt is pulled. Florida’s Dan
Mullen provided a bit of a blueprint, when he gave
Emory Jones only 3 games in the regular season so he could play in the
Peach Bowl. Let’s expand this to all redshirts.
For transfers, it only makes sense. They’ve been out all year. Give them one game to enjoy life with their new teammates and start to find their way. If coaches can “transfer” without missing one game, I think players deserve to get one game back.
5)
Conferences Get 4 Guaranteed Spots
Can the NCAA limit the number of bowl games
that conferences have agreements with? Probably not. Still, they should.
While it makes sense for the top tier bowls to
ensure they have the best teams playing, things get really silly where bowls
are matching the 8th pick from the Big Ten against the 7th pick from the ACC,
or some nonsense.
With how the New Year’s Six is structured, it creates
weird imbalances. The BCS limited the number of teams from one conference in
the big bowls and the New Year’s Six does not. That is a good thing, because if
the SEC or Big Ten produce 3 or 4 worthy teams, they deserve to play in the
biggest games.
However, it’s killing the lower level bowls by
creating weird, uneven matchups, of 8- and 9-win teams playing 6-win teams.
Furthermore, it’s crushing the Group of Five teams, who scramble to play each
other in empty stadiums before Christmas, which only deepens the perception
they’re playing a
different sport than the Power Five.
Capitalism isn’t always good. It’s great here.
Let the bowl games make the best matchups possible and leave the tie-ins for
6-win teams in the past.
This is aimed fairly specifically at Orlando,
but others have tried and rumors are others will try again. There is simply no
reason for the Citrus Bowl, now Camping World Stadium, to host
three bowl games.
It’s beyond pathetic to watch the Cure Bowl
played in front of 60,000 empty seats, especially when UCF has a perfectly
suitable stadium in the same city that seats 40,000.
It’s even worse to watch a quality matchup
between Syracuse and West Virginia played in front of 30,000 empty seats,
despite a sea of Orange enveloping Orlando. Why did this happen? Because the
locals only go to one game and they’re going to go to the real Citrus Bowl on
New Year’s Day.
Imagine if that Syracuse/West Virginia game
was played in Jacksonville for the Gator Bowl. That would have been a much
larger crowd because the locals would have attended if their bowl had a top 20
matchup. Instead, the Gator Bowl had Texas A&M playing an inferior NC State
team and no one cared.
That, ultimately, is the goal of these
suggestions. We need to make people care about the bowls again.
Totally agree about playing games after the early signing period.
ReplyDeleteI like all your ideas. For my idea a couple upfront changes. NCAA needs a schedule zar. Scrap all these games scheduled 10 years out unless it fits the structure. Eliminate divisions. Teams must play FCS opener, Group 5 and Power 5. These must be same rank or higher from season before. In most cases there isn't a need for championship game. Most are easily decided prior. If one hasn't then "bowl season committee" will need to consider this. Championship week is the new bowl week. The games are set at the closest neutral site between both teams Then after all of these games shake out. Which factor in your seeding for the new playoff which is the NY6 bowls. In these games Seniors are paid, Fresh-Jr are payed by performance. Players that have declared for the draft NCAA will cover premiums on their plans.
ReplyDelete